Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Siswa Berprestasi Berbasis Web di SMP Katolik Palla

Authors

  • Margaretha Ferni Diu Universitas Stella Maris Sumba
  • Yulius Nahak Tetik Universitas Stella Maris Sumba
  • Mitra Permata Ayu Universitas Stella Maris Sumba

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59024/jiti.v4i4.2544

Keywords:

Analytical Hierarchy Process, Decision Support System, Outstanding Students, Student Ranking, Web

Abstract

The selection of outstanding students at SMP Katolik Palla still faces challenges due to a manual assessment process, particularly in terms of subjectivity, data processing, and documentation of selection results. This study aims to implement the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method in a web-based Decision Support System (DSS) to support a more structured selection process for outstanding students. Data were collected through observation and interviews and consisted of student data, assessment criteria, and student scores. AHP was applied to determine the priority weights of the criteria through pairwise comparisons, matrix normalization, and consistency testing. The system uses five criteria: Academic, Non-Academic, Attendance/Discipline, Attitude/Behavior, and Extracurricular Activity. The calculation results produced criterion weights of 42.24%, 25.22%, 15.06%, 10.20%, and 7.27%, respectively. The consistency test resulted in a Consistency Ratio (CR) of 0.0166, indicating that the pairwise comparison matrix was consistent because CR < 0.10. The alternative scores were then processed using the resulting criterion weights to determine the final scores and student rankings. Functional testing using the Black Box Testing method showed that the main system functions operated according to the defined test scenarios. The results indicate that the implementation of AHP in a DSS can integrate the processes of criterion management, student assessment, calculation, and ranking in a structured manner and can serve as a decision-support tool for school selection processes.

References

Aksoy, O., Demir, S., Ersoz, N. D., & Dilman Gokkaya, M. (2024). Assessment of an effective quantitative model with multi-criteria decision-making method for sustainable campus. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31, 13230–13245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32040-7

Alowaigl, A., Al-Shqeerat, K. H. A., & Hadwan, M. (2022). A multi-criteria assessment of decision support systems in educational environments. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 22(2), 985–996. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v22.i2.pp985-996

Alturas, B. (2023). Connection between UML use case diagrams and UML class diagrams: A matrix proposal. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 72(3), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCAT.2023.133294

Chen, X., Xie, H., Tao, X., Wang, F. L., & Cao, J. (2024). Leveraging text mining and analytic hierarchy process for the automatic evaluation of online courses. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 15(11), 4973–4998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-024-02203-6

Costa, D. S., Mamede, H. S., & da Silva, M. M. (2023). A method for selecting processes for automation with AHP and TOPSIS. Heliyon, 9(3), e13683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13683

Dasan, M. A., Bementa, E., Aslam, M., & Little Flower, V. F. (2024). Multi-attribute decision-making problem in career determination using single-valued neutrosophic distance measure. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 10, 5411–5425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-024-01433-z

Estrada-Esponda, R. D., López-Benítez, M., Matturro, G., & Osorio-Gómez, J. C. (2024). Selection of software agile practices using analytic hierarchy process. Heliyon, 10(1), e22948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22948

Fahd, K., & Miah, S. J. (2023). Designing and evaluating a big data analytics approach for predicting students’ success factors. Journal of Big Data, 10, 159. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-023-00835-z

Kumar, A., & Pant, S. (2022). Analytical hierarchy process for sustainable agriculture: An overview. MethodsX, 10, 101954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101954

Sahin, S. (2024). Utilizing AHP and conjoint analysis in educational research: Characteristics of a good mathematical problem. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 25375–25401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12830-9

Sreenivasan, A., Suresh, M., Nedungadi, P., & Raman, R. R. (2023). Mapping analytical hierarchy process research to sustainable development goals: Bibliometric and social network analysis. Heliyon, 9(8), e19077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19077

Stofkova, J., Krejnus, M., Stofkova, K. R., Malega, P., & Binasova, V. (2022). Use of the analytic hierarchy process and selected methods in the managerial decision-making process in the context of sustainable development. Sustainability, 14(18), 11546. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811546

Telaumbanua, L. Y., & Siregar, R. A. (2025). Decision support system for selecting the best graduates of undergraduate students using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method. International Journal of Informatics and Data Science, 2(2), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.64366/ijids.v2i2.28

Umar, M. A., & Lano, K. (2024). Advances in automated support for requirements engineering: A systematic literature review. Requirements Engineering, 29, 177–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-023-00411-0

Wang, Y.-H. (2023). Effectiveness of gamification and selection of appropriate teaching methods of creativity: Students’ perspectives. Heliyon, 9, e20420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20420

Downloads

Published

2026-10-03