Komparasi Usability dan User Experience SeaBank, Bank Jago, dan blu by BCA Digital pada Generasi Z

Authors

  • Anna Afrilliya Supriyanti Simatupang Universitas Merdeka Malang
  • Haris Satriyawan Universitas Merdeka Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59024/jiti.v4i3.2427

Keywords:

Digital banking, Generation Z, System Usability Scale, User Experience Questionnaire, Usability

Abstract

Digital banking competition requires providers to ensure that transaction features are not only complete but also easy, efficient, and engaging for users. This study compares the usability and user experience of SeaBank, Bank Jago, and blu by BCA Digital among Generation Z users. A quantitative comparative cross-sectional design was applied to 126 respondents, with 42 users representing each application, selected through purposive and quota sampling. Usability was measured using the 10-item System Usability Scale, while user experience was evaluated through the 26-item User Experience Questionnaire covering attractiveness, perspicuity, efficiency, dependability, stimulation, and novelty. The results show that SeaBank achieved the highest SUS score (82.0), followed by Bank Jago (77.2) and blu by BCA Digital (75.5); all three were classified as acceptable. Significant differences were found in overall SUS scores and in the UEQ dimensions of perspicuity, efficiency, and stimulation, whereas attractiveness, dependability, and novelty did not differ significantly. Pairwise tests indicated that the most consistent differences involved blu by BCA Digital. The findings imply that SeaBank and Bank Jago have relatively strong usability and user-experience profiles, while blu by BCA Digital should prioritize clearer interaction flows, perceived efficiency, and a more stimulating transaction experience.

References

Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 4.

Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis.

Mujinga, M. (2024). Online banking user experience: A User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) assessment in South Africa. Indonesian Journal of Information Systems, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.24002/ijis.v6i2.8606

Napitupulu, A., & Hidayati, R. (2024). Evaluasi tingkat kepuasan pengguna dan usability aplikasi Grab menggunakan metode pengujian usability dan System Usability Scale (SUS). Seminar Nasional Sistem Informasi, 4721–4729.

Nurahmasari, M., Silfiyah, S. N., & Pangaribuan, C. H. (2023). The intention to use digital banking services among Gen Z in Indonesia based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Madani, (1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.51353/jmbm.v5i1.692

Permana, A. (2025). Perbandingan efektivitas desain user experience pada platform pembayaran digital (Studi kasus pada GoPay, OVO, DANA). JIKO (Jurnal Informatika dan Komputer), 9(2), 263. https://doi.org/10.26798/jiko.v9i2.1346

Populix. (2024). Studi analisis ekosistem dan persepsi terhadap bank digital di Indonesia.

Priandani, N. D., Sandy, Y. A., & Sari, N. R. (2023). User experience evaluation of Botani mobile application using User Experience Questionnaire. JTMI: Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Informatika, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.26905/jtmi.v9i1.9025

Purnamasari, R., & Thaha, A. R. (2025). Understanding user satisfaction in digital banking: Sentiment analysis and topic modeling of Indonesian bank reviews. Business Informatics, 19(3), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.17323/2587-814X.2025.3.101.112

Ratnawati, S., & Anandito, W. D. (2024). Analisis usability pada aplikasi mobile banking BCA menggunakan System Usability Scale (SUS). Jurnal Perangkat Lunak, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.32520/jupel.v6i2.3285

Rinjani, A. N., Nandika, K. A., Dahnaily, S., Nafisiyah, M., & Fauziyah, I. S. (2024). Pengaruh bank digital terhadap minat Gen Z. Indonesian Journal of Economics, 1(4).

Schankin, A., Budde, M., Riedel, T., & Beigl, M. (2022). Psychometric properties of the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502098

Schrepp, M. (2023). User experience questionnaire handbook (11th ed.). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2815.0245

Setiyawati, N., & Bangkalang, D. H. (2022). The comparison of evaluation on user experience and usability of mobile banking applications using User Experience Questionnaire and System Usability Scale. International Academic Symposium of Social Science 2022, 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022082087

Shafar, R. M. (2025). Analisis usability pada aplikasi mobile banking menggunakan System Usability Scale (SUS). Margonda.

Simamora, A. P., Adiyanto, & Winanti. (2023). Evaluasi user experience pada aplikasi bank digital SeaBank. Jurnal IPSIKOM, 11. https://doi.org/10.58217/ipsikom.v11i2.254

Soyupak, O., & Ipek, H. (2026). Exploring user experience and usability of mobile and open banking for digital natives in Türkiye. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-02-2024-0051

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (3rd ed.). Alfabeta.

Supriyadi, F. T., & Darwanto, D. (2023). Investigating drivers of digital banking adoption of Gen Z in Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, 12(2), 257. https://doi.org/10.26418/Jebik.V12i2.67212

Windasari, N. A., Kusumawati, N., Larasati, N., & Amelia, R. P. (2022). Digital-only banking experience: Insights from Gen Y and Gen Z. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100170

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31