Kesantunan Berbahasa Santri Putra di Lingkungan Pondok Pesantren Roudlotul Ulum Karangtanjung Alian Kebumen: Kajian Pragmatik

Authors

  • Ibnu Fauzi Universitas Ma'arif Nahdlatul Ulama Kebumen
  • Muh. Akbar Kurniawan Universitas Ma'arif Nahdlatul Ulama Kebumen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59024/simpati.v4i3.1970

Keywords:

Agreement Maxim, Generosity Maxim, Language Politeness, Male Students, Tact Maxim.

Abstract

This In the male student community of Pondok Pesantren Roudlotul Ulum Karangtanjung Alian Kebumen, language use reflects a dynamic negotiation of politeness shaped by hierarchical relations and daily social interaction, yet systematic analysis of such politeness practices remains limited. This study aims to describe the forms of compliance and violations of Geoffrey Leech’s Politeness Principle in the daily interactions of male students. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed, using 126 utterances as the data source collected through observation, recording, note-taking, and interviews. The data were analyzed using the extralingual equivalent method based on Leech’s six politeness maxims: tact, generosity, approbation, modesty, agreement, and sympathy. The findings reveal 78 utterances indicating politeness compliance and 48 utterances showing politeness violations. Compliance is predominantly realized in approbation and tact maxims, particularly through expressions of praise, permission requests, and indirect requests. In contrast, violations frequently occur in agreement and approbation maxims, marked by rejection of suggestions and direct criticism among students. The study concludes that politeness practices among male students are context-dependent and fluctuate between adherence to and deviation from politeness norms. These findings contribute to pragmatics by enriching empirical evidence of politeness behavior in pesantren discourse and offer implications for language education in fostering more contextually aware communicative competence.

References

Bintang, Noval Ardian, and Aida Azizah. 2023. “Kesantunan Berbahasa Dalam Interaksi Sosial Di Pondok Pesantren Robby Rodliyah.” Pp. 2017–23 in Seminar Nasional Daring Sinergi. Vol. 1.

Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.

Calista, Olivia Andi, Mulyono, and Dianita Indrawati. 2025. “Strategi Kesantunan Berbahasa Dalam Tindak Tutur Santri Perempuan Pondok Pesantren Al-Masruriyyah Tebuireng Jombang.” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar 10(September):300.

Creswell, John W. 2018. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. edited by 5. SAGE Publications.

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2016. Politeness and Impoliteness. Wiley.

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2021. “Impoliteness and (Im)Politeness Theory.” Journal of Pragmatics 180:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.001.

Fauzi, Muhammad, and Umi Hasanah. 2023. “Prinsip Kesantunan Leech Dalam Komunikasi Santri.” Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa Dan Sastra 9(2):77–89.

Leech, G N. 1983. “Principles of Pragmatics. London, UK: Longman.”

Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. Longman.

Lincoln, Yvonna S., and Egon G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Mahsun. 2017. Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi, Metode, Dan Tekniknya. Rajawali Pers.

Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldaña. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. edited by 3. SAGE Publications.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2019. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. edited by Revisi. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Pratama, I., and D. Lestari. 2024. “Politeness and Social Hierarchy in Pesantren Communication.” International Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(1):15–28.

Sugiyono. 2021. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Susylowati, E, and T. Wisudawanto. 2021. “Kesantunan Berbahasa Santri Perempuan Di Pesantren.” Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia 10(2):101–18.

Susylowati, Eka, and Rahmat Wisudawanto. 2021. “Kesantunan Berbahasa Santri Wanita Dalam Komunikasi Di Pesantren.” Jurnal Ketatabahasaan Dan Kesusastraan 2(16):154–67.

Thomas, Jenny. 1995. Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Routledge.

Wardhaugh, Ronald, and Janet M. Fuller. 2021. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Vol. 8. Wiley Blackwell.

Yule, George. 2020a. Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Yule, George. 2020b. The Study of Language. Vol. 7. Cambridge University Press.

Yuliana, S., and Z. Arifin. 2023. “Kesantunan Berbahasa Santri Dalam Interaksi Sehari-Hari Di Pesantren.” Jurnal Bahasa Dan Pendidikan 13(2):98–110.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-03

How to Cite

Ibnu Fauzi, & Muh. Akbar Kurniawan. (2026). Kesantunan Berbahasa Santri Putra di Lingkungan Pondok Pesantren Roudlotul Ulum Karangtanjung Alian Kebumen: Kajian Pragmatik. Simpati, 4(3), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.59024/simpati.v4i3.1970

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.