Presuposisi dalam Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Melarang di Desa Ngoro, Kecamatan Ngoro, Kabupaten Mojokerto

Authors

  • Dina Aryu Nur Islami Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Danang Wijoyanto Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59024/simpati.v2i3.873

Keywords:

Presuppositions, Illocutionary Speech Acts Prohibit, prohibition procedures

Abstract

According to Yule in (Pragmatics, 2006:43) presupposition is the speaker's assumption before speaking to the person he is speaking to as an action that produces speech. The aim of this research is how presuppositions in illocutionary speech acts prohibit based on the procedures in the area studied. The theory used in this research is Yule's presupposition theory and is supported by Leech's pragmatic semantic theory. The method used is communication ethnography. Data collection was carried out using the bush and talk method. The data that has been collected is then processed using categorical, descriptive and distributional methods. In this study, the types of speakers were based on age, namely children, teenagers and adults. This research also uses six types of presuppositions. The way to speak when forbidding is based on sound, namely in a soft voice, low voice and loud voice. Apart from that, the prohibition procedure can also be based on its form. Based on the form, there are forms with words, without words and mixed. Then when the speech is delivered it is also explained according to the situation. There are two situations, the situation of oneself and the situation of many people.

References

Apritus Jana, T. (2023). Tindak tutur direktif dalam transaksi jual-beli di pasar rakyat Kedurang. 1-10.

Auliya, D. A. (2012). Struktur pertuturan “Segmen 2 saja cukup waktu Indonesia Timur (WIT)”: Kajian stilistika pragmatik. 1-6.

Ayupradani, N. T. (2021). Bentuk tuturan direktif dalam akun Twitter @Fiersabesari. 1-13.

Budiman, S. A. (2016). Tindak tutur ilokusi direktif dalam komik Insekt karya Sascha Hommer. 1-10.

Chaer, A. (2010). Kesantunan berbahasa. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Ekawati, M. (2017). Kesantunan semu pada tindak tutur ekspresif.

Fitria, H. K. (2021). Fungsi tindak tutur ilokusi asertif dalam naskah drama Dantons Tod karya Georg Büchner. 1-10.

Handayani, N. T. (2020). Presuposisi sajrone tindak tutur ilokusi kapercayan/konstatif misuhi ing Desa Panditan, Kecamatan Lumbang, Kabupaten Pasuruan. 1-20.

Herawati. (n.d.). Kalimat larangan dalam bahasa Jawa (Prohibition sentence in Javanese). 1-10.

Ibrahim, A. S. (1944). Panduan penelitian etnografi komunikasi. Surabaya.

Ibrahim, A. S. (1993). Kajian tindak tutur. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Idris, M. (2007). Kalimat larangan dalam Al-Qur'an (Tinjauan pragmatik: Tindak tutur). 1-19.

Isaura, D. (2011). Variasi fonologis bahasa Jawa di Kabupaten Pemalang.

Jahdiah. (2016). Strategi tindak tutur melarang dalam bahasa Banjar: Tinjauan pragmatik. 1-12.

Leech, G. (2003). Semantik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Rahardi, R. K. (2005). Pragmatik kesantunan imperatif bahasa Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Erlangga.

Rohmadi, M. (n.d.). Kajian pragmatik peran konteks sosial dan budaya dalam tindak tutur bahasa di Pacitan. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka.

Setyaningsih, Y. (2014). Fonologi bahasa.

Tarigan, P. D. (2009). Pengajaran pragmatik. Bandung: Angkasa.

Wijana, I. D. (2009). Analisis wacana pragmatik: Kajian teori dan analisis. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka.

Yule, G. (2006). Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Yule, G. B. (1996). Analisis wacana. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Zakiah, K. (2005). Penelitian etnografi komunikasi: Tipe dan metode. 1-8.

Published

2024-07-29

How to Cite

Dina Aryu Nur Islami, & Danang Wijoyanto. (2024). Presuposisi dalam Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Melarang di Desa Ngoro, Kecamatan Ngoro, Kabupaten Mojokerto. Simpati, 2(3), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.59024/simpati.v2i3.873