Model Embedded Learning untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Evolusi dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi

Authors

  • Rina Astuti Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Rahma Putri Zulaika Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Wardatul Jannah Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59024/simpati.v4i3.2375

Keywords:

Critical Thinking, Embedded Learning Model, Evolution Concept, Learning, Understanding

Abstract

 This study aims to implement and analyze the effectiveness of an embedded learning model in improving the understanding of the concept of evolution and critical thinking skills of Biology Education students. This study used a quantitative approach with a pre-experimental design. The study population was all Biology students taking the Evolution course. The sample was determined using a total sampling technique. Data were collected through learning outcome tests administered in two stages: an initial evaluation (pretest) and a final evaluation (posttest). Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics through the following stages: descriptive statistical analysis, N-Gain calculation, normality test, and hypothesis testing. The results showed an average pretest score of 68.00 with a score range of 30-90 and a standard deviation of 18.90. After implementing the Embedded Learning model, the average posttest score increased slightly to 68.94 with a score range of 42-98. Furthermore, the pretest significance value was 0.011, while the posttest significance value was 0.388. The Embedded Learning model positions lecturers as facilitators, guiding students in connecting evolutionary concepts with various biological phenomena encountered in real life. These findings indicate that the success of a learning model is not only determined by the quality of its implementation but is also influenced by various other factors related to student characteristics and the learning environment.

References

Afifah, S., Mudzakir, A., & Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2022). How to calculate paired sample t-test using SPSS software: From step-by-step processing for users to the practical examples in the analysis of the effect of application anti-fire bamboo teaching materials on student learning outcomes. Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science, 2(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijotis.v2i1.45895

Agustina, P., Arjunani, R. I., Astuti, R., Agustina, L., & Saputra, A. (2025). Effects of the problem-based learning model assisted by mind mapping on the science learning outcomes of junior high school students. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 18(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.47526

Ahmad, N., Toro-Troconis, M., Ibahrine, M., Armour, R., Tait, V., Reedy, K., ... Inzolia, Y. (2023). CoDesignS education for sustainable development: A framework for embedding education for sustainable development in curriculum design. Sustainability, 15(23), Article 16460. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316460

Alters, B. J., & Nelson, C. E. (2002). Perspective: Teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution, 56(10), 1891–1901. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00115.x

Barnes, M. E., Misheva, T., Supriya, K., Rutledge, M., & Brownell, S. E. (2022). A revised measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution: Introducing the MATE 2.0. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(1), Article ar10. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-05-0127

Campbell, D. T. (2017). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. In Sociological Methods (pp. 243–263). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315129945

Carl, B., & Marlene, S. (2018). Fixing Humpty Dumpty: Putting higher-order skills and knowledge together again. In Theory of Teaching Thinking (pp. 73–88). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315098944

Coley, J. D., & Tanner, K. D. (2012). Common origins of diverse misconceptions: Cognitive principles and the development of biology thinking. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11(3), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-06-0074

Gregory, T. R. (2009). Understanding natural selection: Essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2(2), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-009-0128-1

Gurjar, N. R. (2024). Effect of educational program on knowledge and self-care behavior among arthritis patients: Pre-experimental research design. International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing, 52, Article 101038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijotn.2023.101038

Hitchcock, D. (2017). Critical thinking as an educational ideal. In On Reasoning and Argument: Essays in Informal Logic and on Critical Thinking (pp. 477–497). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53562-3_30

Hung, D., Tan, S. C., & Koh, T. S. (2006). Engaged learning: Making learning an authentic experience. In Engaged Learning with Emerging Technologies (pp. 29–48). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3669-8

Kusumadani, A. I., Agustina, L., Astuti, R., Agustina, P., & Affandy, H. (2026). The effectiveness of the socioscientific blended project-based learning (PjBL) model in improving higher-order thinking skills. Journal of Biology Learning, 8(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.32585/jbl.v8i1.8044

Lethulur, N. D., Juandi, D., & Dahlan, J. A. (2025). The effectiveness of discovery, inquiry, problem, and project-based learning in mathematics education: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 26(1), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa.v26i1.pp268-279

Nelson, C. E., Scharmann, L. C., Beard, J., & Flammer, L. I. (2019). The nature of science as a foundation for fostering a better understanding of evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 12(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-019-0100-7

Peker, D., Comert, G. G., & Kence, A. (2010). Three decades of anti-evolution campaign and its results: Turkish undergraduates' acceptance and understanding of the biological evolution theory. Science & Education, 19(6), 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9199-1

Saepuloh, D., Sabur, A., Lestari, S., & Uâ, S. (2021). Improving students' critical thinking and self-efficacy by learning higher order thinking skills through problem based learning models. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 10(3), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v10i3.31029

Smith, G., Ichda, M. A., Alfan, M., & Kuncoro, T. (2023). Literacy studies: Implementation of problem-based learning models to improve critical thinking skills in elementary school students. KnE Social Sciences, 8(10), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i10.13449

Sudarma, T. F., Festiyed, F., Fadilah, M., Diliarosta, S., Tanjung, R., & Yao, G. (2026). Effects of mobile learning on critical thinking skills using problem based learning. Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship, 8(1), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v8i1.674

Tafakur, T., Retnawati, H., & Shukri, A. A. M. (2023). Effectiveness of project-based learning for enhancing students' critical thinking skills: A meta-analysis. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 9(2), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.22219/jinop.v9i2.22142

Wertsch, J. V. (1979). From social interaction to higher psychological processes: A clarification and application of Vygotsky's theory. Human Development, 22(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1159/000272425

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

Rina Astuti, Rahma Putri Zulaika, & Wardatul Jannah. (2026). Model Embedded Learning untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Evolusi dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi. Simpati, 4(3), 520–532. https://doi.org/10.59024/simpati.v4i3.2375

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.