Students' Perception Toward the Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Applications in English Learning at SMP Negeri 18 Surakarta

Betha Nur Salsabilla; Imroatul Ma'fiyah; Sumardiono Sumardiono

doi:10.59024/simpati.v4i3.2308

Authors

Betha Nur Salsabilla Universitas Slamet Riyadi
Imroatul Ma'fiyah Universitas Slamet Riyadi
Sumardiono Sumardiono Universitas Slamet Riyadi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59024/simpati.v4i3.2308

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, English Learning, Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Usefulness, Technology Acceptance Model.

Abstract

The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has increasingly influenced English language learning, particularly through applications such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Google Translate. This study aimed to investigate students' perceptions toward the use of AI-based applications in English learning and to identify the perceived benefits and challenges of these applications. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed, involving 90 seventh-grade students of SMP Negeri 18 Surakarta as primary respondents, supported by interviews with 3-5 students. Data were collected through an open-ended questionnaire distributed via Google Form and analyzed using the Miles and Huberman model, comprising data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing, guided by the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The findings show that students hold positive perceptions toward AI, reporting high levels of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, positive attitude, and strong behavioral intention to continue using AI. AI was found to help students understand lessons, complete assignments, and build vocabulary and grammar skills, while increasing motivation and confidence. However, challenges such as prompt-writing difficulties, technical problems, and risks of overdependence were also identified. The study implies that AI can effectively support English learning when used responsibly and with adequate pedagogical guidance.

References

Anggraeni, S. A. (2025). Pemanfaatan AI dalam pengembangan keterampilan menulis bahasa Inggris: Manfaat, tantangan, dan persepsi pengguna. Karimah Tauhid, 4(8), 5888–5905. https://doi.org/10.30997/karimahtauhid.v4i8.19961

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Faisal, F., Harningsih, N. O., & Razali, R. (2026). From awareness to adoption: English teachers’ artificial intelligence acceptance in junior high schools. English Learning Innovation, 7(1), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.22219/englie.v7i1.42559

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Godwin-Jones, R. (2021). Evolving technologies for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 25(3), 6–26. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73443

Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384436

Halim, H., Mawaddah, N. N., Saputra, Y. W., & Sutriani, S. (2026). University students’ perceptions and attitudes toward AI use in learning: Benefits and concerns. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 7(2), 1063–1079. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v7i2.1601

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promise and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Holmes, W., Stracke, C. M., Chounta, I.-A., Allen, D., Baten, D., Dimitrova, V., Havinga, B., Norrmen-Smith, J., & Wasson, B. (2023). AI and education: A view through the lens of human rights, democracy and the rule of law. Legal and Organizational Requirements, 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_12

Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12318

Luckin, R., & Holmes, W. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.

On, S., Kheang, T., Phal, C., & Srim, S. (2024). Students’ perception of the impact of AI generative tools in learning the English language. Cambodian Journal of Educational and Social Sciences (CJESS), 1(2), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.69496/cjess.v1i2.38

Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020

Syahriyanti, Weda, S., & Iskandar. (2024). Artificial intelligence–based English instruction: Implementation, challenges, and learning outcomes in Indonesian high schools. Indonesian TESOL Journal, 6(2), 192–207. https://ejournal.iainpalopo.ac.id/index.php/ITJ/article/view/8796

Tiana, D. M., Hastuti, D. P., & Rahayuningsih, R. (2025). The future speaks: Exploring artificial intelligence’s impact on EFL students’ speaking skills. Journal on Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 13(2), 5805–5826. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.8080

Tracy, S. J. (2024). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. John Wiley & Sons.

UNESCO. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. UNESCO Publishing.

Zhu, M., & Wang, C. (2024). A systematic review of artificial intelligence in language education from 2013 to 2023: Current status and future implications. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4684304